AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Daedalus pure moods10/30/2023 ![]() If the state tolerates “petty” bribes, a vicious cycle can develop that may escalate and undermine all public programs. Payoffs contribute to societal dysfunction, even if those who pay bribes are better off in the short term than those who do not. This, in turn, hampers economic growth and limits opportunities for investment and trade that arise from better economic conditions.Īlthough one may sympathize with citizens facing extortionate demands, few would hesitate to label such systems corrupt. Finally, even if a kickback helps win an individual deal, systemic corruption introduces inefficiencies and reduces competitiveness and private-sector development. Second, most international companies are subject to anticorruption regimes in their home countries if those jurisdictions have ratified the oecd Convention–meaning that the competition often faces the same ethical and legal obstructions as U.S. ![]() capital markets or are otherwise linked to the U.S. companies but also to all companies that are listed on U.S. That claim is deeply misleading it overstates the case and denies the importance of ethical business dealings. businesses claim that enforcing the fcpa harms America's economic interests. The United States has been an aggressive enforcer of the fcpa under the umbrella of the oecd Convention. No one disputes that a system of kickbacks imposes higher costs to host countries’ citizens compared with an honest system, but parties to these contracts argue that the only alternative is no investment at all. Nevertheless, some see these payoffs as “necessary payments” ( notwendigen Ausgaben, the term once used by German firms to account for such payments in their financial records). ![]() Even bribes paid to finalize deals in deeply corrupt environments fall under these legal strictures. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ( fcpa) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ( oecd) Anticorruption Convention. Legal instruments outlawing corruption in international business deals include the U.S. This excuse is often a non-starter under the law: in international contracts, such behaviors might be prohibited by the laws of the host country, a corporation's home country, or both. If accepting kickbacks for major contracts, privatizations, or concessions is unambiguously corrupt, what about the firms that make such payments? Firms excuse payoffs by claiming that they cannot otherwise do business in a country where corruption is the norm. Officials who administer public programs without gaining personal benefits are not corrupt, in my view, even if the programs’ values are abhorrent and immoral. Rather, under my definition, corruption occurs when an official charged with a public responsibility operates in his or her own interest in a way that undermines the program's aims, whatever they may be. 2 Payoffs can undermine each of these values, but departures from any particular value system do not constitute corruption per se. 1 In the same spirit, Alina Mungiu-Pippidi has asserted that corruption constitutes deviations from ethical universalism, a view also held, with some modifications, by Robert Rotberg. If, as Bo Rothstein has argued, the state ought to treat everyone impartially, then favoritism is corrupt. If expertise sets the standard, then efforts to undermine science are corrupt. If one places the competitive market on a pedestal, then monopoly power is corrupt. If one takes majority rule as the gold standard for public action, then deviations from that voting mechanism are corrupt.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |